Solving Two Conjectures regarding Codes for Location in Circulant Graphs

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: Identifying and locating-dominating codes have been widely studied in circulant graphs of type Cn(1,2,ldots,r), which can also be viewed as power graphs of cycles. Recently, Ghebleh and Niepel (2013) considered identification and location-domination in the circulant graphs Cn(1,3). They showed that the smallest cardinality of a locating-dominating code in Cn(1,3) is at least lceiln/3ceil and at most lceiln/3ceil+1 for all ngeq9. Moreover, they proved that the lower bound is strict when nequiv0,1,4pmod6 and conjectured that the lower bound can be increased by one for other n. In this paper, we prove their conjecture. Similarly, they showed that the smallest cardinality of an identifying code in Cn(1,3) is at least lceil4n/11ceil and at most lceil4n/11ceil+1 for all ngeq11. Furthermore, they proved that the lower bound is attained for most of the lengths n and conjectured that in the rest of the cases the lower bound can improved by one. This conjecture is also proved in the paper. The proofs of the conjectures are based on a novel approach which, instead of making use of the local properties of the graphs as is usual to identification and location-domination, also manages to take advantage of the global properties of the codes and the underlying graphs.











This page was built for publication: Solving Two Conjectures regarding Codes for Location in Circulant Graphs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4611776)