Correction to ''A boundary link is trivial if the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category of its complement is one''
This correction concerns an error in Theorem 1 of the paper [ibid. 29, No. 2, 329-337 (1992; Zbl 0782.57014)], however the author states that the theorem remains valid by an argument from a recent paper of the author.
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 720177