Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
type: Item
instance of: scholarly article
title: Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
zbMATH Open document ID: 1478.68339
author: Leila Amgoud
author: Dragan Doder
author: Srdjan Vesic
published in: Artificial Intelligence
publication date: 2021-12-13T00:00:00Z
full work available at URL: AIJ Amgoud Doder Vesic 2021.pdf
Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 68T27
zbMATH DE Number: 7443177
zbMATH Keywords: argumentation
zbMATH Keywords: gradual semantics
zbMATH Keywords: axiomatic foundations
MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile
OpenAlex ID: W3206015054
cites work: Q3493310
cites work: A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
cites work: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
cites work: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
cites work: A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
cites work: Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
cites work: Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
cites work: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
cites work: SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
cites work: Q5715696
cites work: A Parametrized Ranking-Based Semantics for Persuasion
cites work: On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
cites work: Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
cites work: From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
cites work: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
cites work: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
cites work: A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
cites work: Equilibrium states in numerical argumentation networks
cites work: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
cites work: A general account of argumentation with preferences
cites work: A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
cites work: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
cites work: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
cites work: On the Use of Argumentation for Multiple Criteria Decision Making
cites work: Q4999256
cites work: On instantiating generalised properties of gradual argumentation frameworks
cites work: Q5817870
cites work: Q2752005
cites work: Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
cites work: Q3624135
cites work: Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
cites work: The first international competition on computational models of argumentation: results and analysis
cites work: Controlling a solver execution with the runsolver Tool
cites work: A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation
cites work: Equivalence in logic-based argumentation
cites work: Q3455611
cites work: Introducing Equational Semantics for Argumentation Networks
cites work: Probabilistic Reasoning with Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
DOI: 10.1016/J.ARTINT.2021.103607
Recommended article: Argumentation Frameworks with Attack Classification
Recommended article: Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
Recommended article: Graph-classes of argumentation frameworks with collective attacks
Recommended article: Logical modes of attack in argumentation networks
Recommended article: Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks
Recommended article: Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview
description: scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7443177