Stability of the integral control of stable nonlinear systems

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: PI controllers are the most widespread type of controllers and there is an intuitive understanding that if their gains are sufficiently small and of the correct sign, then they always work. In this paper we try to give some rigorous backing to this claim, under specific assumptions. Let be a nonlinear system described by dotx=f(x,u), y=g(x), where the state trajectory x takes values in Rn, u and y are scalar and f,g are of class C1. We assume that there is a Lipschitz function Xi:[umin,umax]ightarrowRn such that for every constant input u0in[umin,umax], Xi(u0) is an exponentially stable equilibrium point of . We also assume that G(u)=g(Xi(u)), which is the steady state input-output map of , is strictly increasing. Denoting ymin=G(umin) and ymax=G(umax), we assume that the reference value r is in (ymin,ymax). Our aim is that y should track r, i.e., yightarrowr as tightarrowinfty, while the input of P is only allowed to be in [umin,umax]. For this, we introduce a variation of the integrator, called the saturating integrator, and connect it in feedback with in the standard way, with gain k>0. We show that for any small enough k, the closed-loop system is (locally) exponentially stable around an equilibrium point (Xi(ur),ur), with a large region of attraction XTsubsetRnimes[umin,umax]. When the state (x(t),u(t)) of the closed-loop system converges to (Xi(ur),ur), then the tracking error r−y tends to zero. The compact set XT can be made larger by choosing a larger parameter T>0, resulting in smaller k.














This page was built for publication: Stability of the integral control of stable nonlinear systems

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6278681)