Strong and weak hypotheses

DOI10.12775/LLP.2025.002MaRDI QIDQ6919581zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Daniele Chiffi, Ciro De Florio

Publication date 8 October 2025

Published in Logic and Logical Philosophy (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2025.002

zbMATH Keywords

denialevidencehypothesisillocutionary actsscientific reasoningsemantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10) Probability and inductive logic (03B48)

Cites work

• Abductive cognition. The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning
• An epistemic approach to paraconsistency: a logic of evidence and truth
• Assertion and denial: Aa contribution from logical notations
• Assertion and hypothesis: a logical framework for their opposition relations:
• Cognitive economics and the logic of abduction
• Collected papers. Vol. I: Principles of philosophy. Edited by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss.
• Dual intuitionistic logic and a variety of negations: the logic of scientific research
• Four probability-preserving properties of inferences
• Pragmatic and dialogic interpretations of bi-intuitionism. I
• Pragmatic logics for hypotheses and evidence
• The logical burdens of proof. Assertion and hypothesis
• Towards a polarized semantics for assertion and denial
• Two valued logic.
• We don't know we don't know: asserting ignorance

This page was built for publication: Strong and weak hypotheses

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6919581)