Strong equivalence for argumentation semantics based on conflict-free sets

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_4MaRDI QIDQ3011933zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Sarah Alice Gaggl, Stefan Woltran

Publication date 29 June 2011

Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_4

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Recommendations

• Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
• Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks
• The cf2 argumentation semantics revisited
• Analyzing the Equivalence Zoo in Abstract Argumentation
• The equivalence zoo for Dung-style semantics

Cites work

• A General Framework for Argumentation-Based Negotiation
• Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
• Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
• Strong equivalence for argumentation semantics based on conflict-free sets
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• The cf2 argumentation semantics revisited

Cited in

(11)

• The cf2 argumentation semantics revisited
• The role of self-attacking arguments in characterizations of equivalence notions
• Strong equivalence for argumentation semantics based on conflict-free sets
• Principles of Talmudic logic
• Local Expansion Invariant Operators in Argumentation Semantics
• Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks
• Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
• Equivalence in logic-based argumentation
• The equivalence zoo for Dung-style semantics
• On the different types of collective attacks in abstract argumentation: equivalence results for SETAFs
• Context-free and context-sensitive kernels: update and deletion equivalence in abstract argumentation

This page was built for publication: Strong equivalence for argumentation semantics based on conflict-free sets

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3011933)