Testing for arbitrary interference on experimentation platforms
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Experimentation platforms are essential to modern large technology companies, as they are used to carry out many randomized experiments daily. The classic assumption of no interference among users, under which the outcome of one user does not depend on the treatment assigned to other users, is rarely tenable on such platforms. Here, we introduce an experimental design strategy for testing whether this assumption holds. Our approach is in the spirit of the Durbin-Wu-Hausman test for endogeneity in econometrics, where multiple estimators return the same estimate if and only if the null hypothesis holds. The design that we introduce makes no assumptions on the interference model between units, nor on the network among the units, and has a sharp bound on the variance and an implied analytical bound on the type I error rate. We discuss how to apply the proposed design strategy to large experimentation platforms, and we illustrate it in the context of an experiment on the LinkedIn platform.
Recommendations
- Interference Between Units in Randomized Experiments
- Randomization tests of causal effects under interference
- Average treatment effects in the presence of unknown interference
- Designs for estimating the treatment effect in networks with interference
- Estimating average causal effects under general interference, with application to a social network experiment
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Testing for arbitrary interference on experimentation platforms
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5212914)
