Testing unateness nearly optimally
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: We present an -query algorithm that tests whether an unknown Boolean function is unate (i.e., every variable is either non-decreasing or non-increasing) or -far from unate. The upper bound is nearly optimal given the lower~bound of [CWX17a]. The algorithm builds on a novel use of the binary search procedure and its analysis over long random paths.
Recommendations
- An O(n) queries adaptive tester for unateness
- Beyond Talagrand functions: new lower bounds for testing monotonicity and unateness
- Optimal unateness testers for real-valued functions: adaptivity helps
- Boolean function monotonicity testing requires (almost) \(n^{1/2}\) non-adaptive queries
- Optimal unateness testers for real-valued functions: Adaptivity helps
Cited in
(10)- The forbidden projections of unate functions
- Input-Thrifty Extrema Testing
- An O(n) queries adaptive tester for unateness
- Beyond Talagrand functions: new lower bounds for testing monotonicity and unateness
- Optimal unateness testers for real-valued functions: Adaptivity helps
- Optimal unateness testers for real-valued functions: adaptivity helps
- Flipping out with many flips: hardness of testing \(k\)-monotonicity
- Almost Optimal Distribution-Free Sample-Based Testing of k-Modality
- Approximating the distance to monotonicity of Boolean functions
- Agnostic proper learning of monotone functions: beyond the black-box correction barrier
This page was built for publication: Testing unateness nearly optimally
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5212796)