The A-BDI metamodel for human-level AI. Argumentation as balancing, dialogue and inference

DOI10.1007/978-981-96-7956-0_22MaRDI QIDQ6877220zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Liuwen Yu, Leendert van der Torre

Publication date 8 January 2026

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-7956-0_22

zbMATH Keywords

hybrid artificial intelligenceknowledge representation and reasoningmetamodel for argumentationmethodology of argumentation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cites work

• A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics
• Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification
• Designing normative theories for ethical and legal reasoning: \textsc{LogiKEy} framework, methodology, and tool support
• Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
• Higher-order interactions (bipolar or not) in abstract argumentation: a state of the art
• How to reason defeasibly
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1305381 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6934384 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3288322 (Why is no real title available?)
• Justification and defeat
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
• The Jiminy advisor: moral agreements among stakeholders based on norms and argumentation
• Towards a general framework for dialogues that accommodate reasoning about preferences

This page was built for publication: The A-BDI metamodel for human-level AI. Argumentation as balancing, dialogue and inference

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6877220)