The Performance of the Collocation and Galerkin Methods with Hermite Bi-Cubics
From MaRDI portal
Cholesky factorizationcollocationcomparison methodscomputational complexitycomputer timeerror measurementexperimental studyGalerkinGauss eliminationHermite bi-cubic
Boundary value problems for second-order elliptic equations (35J25) Direct numerical methods for linear systems and matrix inversion (65F05) Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N30) Spectral, collocation and related methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N35)
Cited in
(12)- A finite element based collocation method for eigenvalue calculations
- A fast algorithm for solving the tensor product collocation equations
- The use of the generalized extended to the limit sparse factorization techniques for the solution of non-linear elliptic and parabolic difference equations
- Mathematical software: Past, present, and future
- A new decoupling technique for the Hermite cubic collocation equations arising from boundary value problems
- Orthogonal collocation revisited
- Enriched collocation finite element method, a model problem
- A collocated C^0 finite element method: reduced quadrature perspective, cost comparison with standard finite elements, and explicit structural dynamics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4169959 (Why is no real title available?)
- Orthogonal collocation solution of biharmonic equations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5018718 (Why is no real title available?)
- Vorticity induced by a moving elliptic belt
This page was built for publication: The Performance of the Collocation and Galerkin Methods with Hermite Bi-Cubics
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3675474)
