The Role of Expert Judgment in Statistical Inference and Evidence-Based Decision-Making

DOI10.1080/00031305.2018.1529623MaRDI QIDQ5868227zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors N. C. Brownstein, Thomas A. Louis, Anthony O'Hagan, Jane F. Pendergast

Publication date 20 September 2022

Published in The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1529623

zbMATH Keywords

Bayesian paradigmclinical trialscollaborationelicitationscientific methodsubjectivity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites work

• A Definition of Subjective Probability
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3385132 (Why is no real title available?)
• Leadership in Statistics: Increasing Our Value and Visibility
• Networks
• The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose

Cited in

(8)

• Influential sources of uncertainty in glyphosate biochemical degradation in soil
• Comment: ``Bayes, oracle Bayes, and empirical Bayes
• Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
• Quality Control for Scientific Research: Addressing Reproducibility, Responsiveness, and Relevance
• Expert Knowledge Elicitation: Subjective but Scientific
• Expert Kaplan–Meier estimation
• Play Call Strategies and Modeling for Target Outcomes in Football
• Prior knowledge elicitation: the past, present, and future

This page was built for publication: The Role of Expert Judgment in Statistical Inference and Evidence-Based Decision-Making

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5868227)