The effect of random-effects misspecification on classification accuracy
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A comparative study of approaches for predicting prostate cancer from longitudinal data
- A comparison of group prediction approaches in longitudinal discriminant analysis
- A Note on Type II Error Under Random Effects Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models
- Bayesian regression analysis of data with random effects covariates from nonlinear longitudinal measurements
- Classification of therapy resistance based on longitudinal biomarker profiles
- Clustering for multivariate continuous and discrete longitudinal data
- Diagnosing misspecification of the random‐effects distribution in mixed models
- Discriminant Analysis for Longitudinal Data with Multiple Continuous Responses and Possibly Missing Data
- Examples in which misspecification of a random effects distribution reduces efficiency, and possible remedies
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 49697 (Why is no real title available?)
- Linear Mixed Models with Flexible Distributions of Random Effects for Longitudinal Data
- Penalized loss functions for Bayesian model comparison
- Predicting renal graft failure using multivariate longitudinal profiles
- Screening for prostate cancer using multivariate mixed-effects models
- Testing for misspecification in generalized linear mixed models
- The effect of misspecifying the random-effects distribution in linear mixed models for longitudinal data
This page was built for publication: The effect of random-effects misspecification on classification accuracy
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6637095)
