The imprecisions of precision measures in process mining
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: In process mining, precision measures are used to quantify how much a process model overapproximates the behavior seen in an event log. Although several measures have been proposed throughout the years, no research has been done to validate whether these measures achieve the intended aim of quantifying over-approximation in a consistent way for all models and logs. This paper fills this gap by postulating a number of axioms for quantifying precision consistently for any log and any model. Further, we show through counter-examples that none of the existing measures consistently quantifies precision.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3046453 (Why is no real title available?)
- Anti-alignments in conformance checking -- the dark side of process models
- Applications and Theory of Petri Nets 2005
- Discovering block-structured process models from event logs -- a constructive approach
- Robust process discovery with artificial negative events
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: The imprecisions of precision measures in process mining
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1708257)