The logical structure of linguistic commitment. III: Brandomian scorekeeping and incompatibility

DOI10.1023/A:1012280814127MaRDI QIDQ5957421zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Mark Norris Lance

Publication date 6 March 2002

Published in Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012280814127

zbMATH Keywords

BrandomBrandomian logical connectivescommitmentincompatibilitylinear logicrelevance logic

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Substructural logics (including relevance, entailment, linear logic, Lambek calculus, BCK and BCI logics) (03B47) Logic of natural languages (03B65)

Review text

[For Parts I and II see ibid. 23, 369-400 (1994; Zbl 0809.03001) and ibid. 25, 425-449 (1996; Zbl 0860.03009), respectively.] The content of Brandomian logical connectives is most naturally captured by a system of linear logic. In order to express ``committively implies in terms of incompatibility a ``minimal incompatibility entailment logic (MIE) is introduced and proved to be sound and complete.

Recommendations

• The logical structure of linguistic commitment. I: Four systems of non- relevant commitment entailment
• The logical structure of linguistic commitment. II: Systems of relevant commitment entailment
• Towards a Logic for Pragmatics. Assertions and Conjectures
• Making it more explicit
• Some critical remarks on incompability semantics

Cites work

• A Useful Substructural Logic
• Four-valued semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3504935 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 972605 (Why is no real title available?)
• Linear logic
• Semantic analysis of orthologic
• Semantic paradox of material implication
• Simplified semantics for basic relevant logics
• The logic of paradox
• The logical structure of linguistic commitment. I: Four systems of non- relevant commitment entailment
• The logical structure of linguistic commitment. II: Systems of relevant commitment entailment
• The semantics and proof theory of linear logic

Cited in

(7)

• The logical structure of linguistic commitment. I: Four systems of non- relevant commitment entailment
• The logical structure of linguistic commitment. II: Systems of relevant commitment entailment
• Meaning as an inferential role
• Between saying and doing: from Lorenzen to Brandom and back
• Some critical remarks on incompability semantics
• Making it more explicit
• SUBATOMIC INFERENCES: AN INFERENTIALIST SEMANTICS FOR ATOMICS, PREDICATES, AND NAMES

This page was built for publication: The logical structure of linguistic commitment. III: Brandomian scorekeeping and incompatibility

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5957421)