The method of Socratic proofs meets correspondence analysis
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A calculus of antinomics
- A lattice of implicative extensions of regular Kleene's logics
- Automated correspondence analysis for the binary extensions of the logic of paradox
- Automatic proof generation in an axiomatic system for \(\mathsf{CPL}\) by means of the method of Socratic proofs
- Bochvar's three-valued logic and literal paralogics: their lattice and functional equivalence
- Completeness via correspondence for extensions of the logic of paradox
- Correspondence analysis for first degree entailment
- Correspondence analysis for logic of rational agent
- Dual erotetic calculi and the minimal \(\mathsf{LFI}\)
- Functional Completeness in CPL via Correspondence Analysis
- Generalized correspondence analysis for three-valued logics
- Handbook of philosophical logic. Vol. 8
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3648682 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3672258 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 46359 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3591947 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2096989 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6418709 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2213621 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3061149 (Why is no real title available?)
- Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and `coupled trees'
- Natural three-valued logics characterized by natural deduction
- On paraconsistent weak Kleene logic: axiomatisation and algebraic analysis
- Questions, inferences, and scenarios
- Rational agency from a truth-functional perspective
- Socratic proofs
- Socratic proofs and paraconsistency: A case study
- Socratic proofs for quantifiers
- The logic of paradox
- The method of Socratic proofs for modal propositional logics: K5, S4.2, S4.3, S4F, S4R, S4M and G.
Cited in
(6)
This page was built for publication: The method of Socratic proofs meets correspondence analysis
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5241406)