The threshold for SDP-refutation of random regular NAE-3SAT
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Unlike its cousin 3SAT, the NAE-3SAT (not-all-equal-3SAT) problem has the property that spectral/SDP algorithms can efficiently refute random instances when the constraint density is a large constant (with high probability). But do these methods work immediately above the "satisfiability threshold", or is there still a range of constraint densities for which random NAE-3SAT instances are unsatisfiable but hard to refute? We show that the latter situation prevails, at least in the context of random regular instances and SDP-based refutation. More precisely, whereas a random -regular instance of NAE-3SAT is easily shown to be unsatisfiable (whp) once , we establish the following sharp threshold result regarding efficient refutation: If then the basic SDP, even augmented with triangle inequalities, fails to refute satisfiability (whp), if then even the most basic spectral algorithm refutes satisfiability~(whp).
Recommendations
- Satisfiability threshold for random regular NAE-SAT
- Satisfiability threshold for random regular \textsc{nae-sat}
- Strongly refuting random CSPs below the spectral threshold
- Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques
- Lower bounds for CSP refutation by SDP hierarchies
Cited in
(7)- A spectral condition for spectral gap: fast mixing in high-temperature Ising models
- Lower bounds for CSP refutation by SDP hierarchies
- Constructing concrete hard instances of the maximum independent set problem
- Explicit Near-Ramanujan Graphs of Every Degree
- Spectral gap in random bipartite biregular graphs and applications
- Perfect matching in random graphs is as hard as Tseitin
- Extreme singular values of inhomogeneous sparse random rectangular matrices
This page was built for publication: The threshold for SDP-refutation of random regular NAE-3SAT
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5236327)