Too many, too improbable: testing joint hypotheses and closed testing shortcuts

DOI10.1016/J.JSPI.2025.106311MaRDI QIDQ6930828zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Phillip B. Mogensen, Bo Markussen

Publication date 12 September 2025

Published in Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSPI.2025.106311

zbMATH Keywords

\(k\)-FWER controlclosed testing procedurecombination testmultiple testingshortcuts

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Nonparametric hypothesis testing (62G10)

Cites work

• 400: A Method for Combining Non-Independent, One-Sided Tests of Significance
• Asymptotic Optimality of Fisher's Method of Combining Independent Tests II
• Cauchy Combination Test: A Powerful Test With Analytic p-Value Calculation Under Arbitrary Dependency Structures
• Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals. With discussion and authors' reply
• Closed procedures are better and often admit a shortcut.
• Combining p-values via averaging
• Combining dependent P-values.
• Fast closed testing for exchangeable local tests
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 720689 (Why is no real title available?)
• Multiple testing for exploratory research
• On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance
• Optimal Whitening and Decorrelation
• Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal Distributions
• Statistical methods for research workers.
• The harmonic mean p-value for combining dependent tests

This page was built for publication: Too many, too improbable: testing joint hypotheses and closed testing shortcuts

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6930828)