Toward compiler implementation correctness proofs
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cited in
(22)- Specification, verification and prototyping of an optimized compiler
- A formally verified compiler back-end
- The WAM case study: Verifying compiler correctness for Prolog with KIV
- Pilsner: a compositionally verified compiler for a higher-order imperative language
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3846848 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3898208 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1374873 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 702367 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1023019 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1543049 (Why is no real title available?)
- Proving the correctness of behavioural implementations
- Proving correctness of compilers using structured graphs
- Proving correctness of compiler optimizations by temporal logic
- Deriving a compiler from an operational semantics written in VDL
- On Trojan horses of Thompson-Goerigk-type, their generation, intrusion, detection and prevention
- Calculating correct compilers
- A Completely Verified Realistic Bootstrap Compiler
- A demonstrably correct compiler
- One approach to the specification and verification of translators
- Correctness of static flow analysis in continuation semantics
- Providing a formal linkage between MDG and HOL
- A short proof of the lexical addressing algorithm
This page was built for publication: Toward compiler implementation correctness proofs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3719796)