Transforming the model T: random effects meta-analysis with stable weights
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- Advantages of variance stabilization
- An Alternative Method for Meta-Analysis
- Assessing the Amount of Heterogeneity in Random‐Effects Meta‐Analysis
- Better Bootstrap Confidence Intervals
- Comparison of methods for fixed effect meta-regression of standardized differences of means
- How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4090552 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 775283 (Why is no real title available?)
- Improved Fisher z estimators for univariate random-effects meta-analysis of correlations
- Meta Analysis
- On Constructing Confidence Intervals for a Standardized Mean Difference in Meta-analysis
- Principles of Statistical Inference
- Reducing the Number of Unjustified Significant Results in Meta-analysis
- Robust variance estimation for random effects meta-analysis
- The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments
- Variance stabilization and the bootstrap
- Variance stabilizing the difference of two binomial proportions
This page was built for publication: Transforming the model T: random effects meta-analysis with stable weights
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6976475)