Two criteria for evaluating risk prediction models

DOI10.1111/J.1541-0420.2010.01523.XMaRDI QIDQ3100813zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Mitchell H. Gail, Ruth M. Pfeiffer

Publication date 21 November 2011

Published in Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3135785

zbMATH Keywords

discriminationdiscriminatory accuracyLorenz curverisk models

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Estimation in survival analysis and censored data (62N02) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Medical applications (general) (92C50)

Recommendations

• On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk
• Evaluating the Predictiveness of a Continuous Marker
• The performance of risk prediction models
• Partial summary measures of the predictiveness curve
• Methods for evaluating prediction performance of biomarkers and tests

Cites work

• A General Definition of the Lorenz Curve
• A parametric ROC model-based approach for evaluating the predictiveness of continuous markers in case-control studies
• Convergence theorems for empirical Lorenz curves and their inverses
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1865745 (Why is no real title available?)
• Inference for Lorenz curve orderings
• On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk
• Statistical inference for testing inequality indices with dependent samples
• The binary regression quantile plot: Assessing the importance of predictors in binary regression visually
• Two further applications of a model for binary regression
• Weak approximations for empirical Lorenz curves and their Goldie inverses of stationary observations

Cited in

(14)

• Two-part models for assessing misrepresentation on risk status
• Flexible risk prediction models for left or interval-censored data from electronic health records
• Risk prediction with machine learning and regression methods
• Binary regression: Total gain in positive and negative predictive values
• Methods for evaluating prediction performance of biomarkers and tests
• Estimating improvement in prediction with matched case-control designs
• Subgroup specific incremental value of new markers for risk prediction
• On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk
• Subgroup specific incremental value of new markers for risk prediction
• Estimating improvement in prediction with matched case-control designs
• Testing for improvement in prediction model performance
• Incorporating auxiliary information into assessment of accuracy and discrimination of risk models when some predictors are missing
• Adopting nested case-control quota sampling designs for the evaluation of risk markers
• Estimating the decision curve and its precision from three study designs

This page was built for publication: Two criteria for evaluating risk prediction models

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3100813)