Understanding best subset selection: a tale of two c(omplex)ities
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A general theory of concave regularization for high-dimensional sparse estimation problems
- A new look at the statistical model identification
- A polynomial algorithm for best-subset selection problem
- Best subset selection via a modern optimization lens
- Best subset, forward stepwise or Lasso? Analysis and recommendations based on extensive comparisons
- Between hard and soft thresholding: optimal iterative thresholding algorithms
- Estimating the dimension of a model
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 782652 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 845714 (Why is no real title available?)
- Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty
- On the conditions used to prove oracle results for the Lasso
- Random Fields and Geometry
- Risk bounds for model selection via penalization
- Schubert varieties and distances between subspaces of different dimensions
- Simultaneous analysis of Lasso and Dantzig selector
- Slow kill for big data learning
- Sparse high-dimensional regression: exact scalable algorithms and phase transitions
- Suprema of chaos processes and the restricted isometry property
- The Generic Chaining
- The sparsity and bias of the LASSO selection in high-dimensional linear regression
- Understanding best subset selection: a tale of two c(omplex)ities
- Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
This page was built for publication: Understanding best subset selection: a tale of two c(omplex)ities
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6979858)