Using well-structured transition systems to decide divergence for catalytic P systems
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1615478 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1343484 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1951598 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3310089 (Why is no real title available?)
- Computationally universal P systems without priorities: Two catalysts are sufficient
- Computing with membranes
- Deterministic catalytic systems are not universal
- Implementation and Application of Automata
- Membrane computing. An introduction.
- The power of catalysts and priorities in membrane systems
- Well-structured transition systems everywhere!
Cited in
(11)- Systolic automata and P systems
- Modeling dependencies and simultaneity in membrane system computations
- Compositional semantics of spiking neural P systems
- Nadia Busi's publications
- Compositional semantics and behavioral equivalences for P systems
- An overview on operational semantics in membrane computing
- Minimal probabilistic P systems for modelling ecological systems
- Simulation of spatial P system models
- Properties of membrane systems
- Encoding catalytic P systems in {\(\pi\)}\@
- Understanding and enhancement of internal clustering validation indexes for categorical data
This page was built for publication: Using well-structured transition systems to decide divergence for catalytic P systems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q872196)
