Verification of validity of syllogisms with intermediate quantifiers is equivalent with checking Peterson's rules
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Formal analysis of Peterson's rules for checking validity of syllogisms with intermediate quantifiers
- An algebraic study of Peterson's intermediate syllogisms
- Validity in Simple Partial Logic
- Syllogisms with Intermediate Quantifiers Solved in Marlo Logic Diagrams
- Validity Measurement in Some Propositional Logics
- A formal theory of generalized intermediate syllogisms
- A logic for qualified syllogisms
- Validity under assumptions and modus ponens
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 440030
Cites work
- A comprehensive theory of trichotomous evaluative linguistic expressions
- A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages
- A formal theory of generalized intermediate syllogisms
- A formal theory of intermediate quantifiers
- Analysis of generalized square of opposition with intermediate quantifiers
- Formal analysis of Peterson's rules for checking validity of syllogisms with intermediate quantifiers
- Graded structures of opposition in fuzzy natural logic
- Syllogisms using 'few', 'many', and 'most'
- The structure of generalized intermediate syllogisms
- The theory of intermediate quantifiers in fuzzy natural logic revisited and the model of ``many
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: Verification of validity of syllogisms with intermediate quantifiers is equivalent with checking Peterson's rules
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6178735)