What should I believe about what would have been the case?

DOI10.1007/S10992-014-9314-XMaRDI QIDQ2018589zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Franz Huber

Publication date 24 March 2015

Published in Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/10836/1/JPL.pdf

IPFS File on IPFS (Hint: this is only the Hash - if you get a timeout, this file is not available on our server.)

zbMATH Keywords

chanceconditional beliefconfirmationcounterfactualscredenceprobability measuresranking functions

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05)

Recommendations

• Should I believe all the truths?
• Knowing how things might have been
• What should have happened if Hardy had discovered this?
• What might be the case after a change in view

Cites work

• A peculiarity in Pearl's logic of interventionist counterfactuals
• A probabilistic semantics for counterfactuals. Part A
• A PROBABILISTIC SEMANTICS FOR COUNTERFACTUALS. PART B
• Actual causation and the art of modeling
• Causality. Models, reasoning, and inference
• Causation, prediction, and search
• Chance and Necessity
• Declarations of independence
• From causal models to counterfactual structures
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1014107 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3298815 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3323559 (Why is no real title available?)
• Iterated revision and minimal change of conditional beliefs
• New foundations for counterfactuals
• On a new axiomatic theory of probability
• On the logic of iterated belief revision
• On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
• Propositional reasoning that tracks probabilistic reasoning
• Reducing belief simpliciter to degrees of belief
• Relative Frequencies
• Structural equations and beyond
• The consistency argument for ranking functions
• The measurement of ranks and the laws of iterated contraction

Cited in

(5)

• Why follow the royal rule?
• New foundations for counterfactuals
• Counterfactuals and probability
• Out of the closet
• Completeness for counter-doxa conditionals -- using ranking semantics

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• TETRAD

This page was built for publication: What should I believe about what would have been the case?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2018589)