When does forced idle time improve performance in polling models?

DOI10.1287/MNSC.44.8.1079MaRDI QIDQ2784014zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Robert B. Cooper, Shun-Chen Niu, Mandyam M. Srinivasan

Publication date 17 April 2002

Published in Management Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.8.1079

zbMATH Keywords

cyclic production systemsdecompositionpolling modelssetup timesswitchover timesvacation modelsvariance paradoxwaiting times

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Production models (90B30) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Recommendations

• MORE ON USING FORCED IDLE TIME TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE IN POLLING MODELS
• Limit theorems for polling models with increasing setups.
• Setups in polling models: does it make sense to set up if no work is waiting?
• Monotonicity of Optimal Performance Measures for Polling Systems
• The Impact of Setup Times on the Performance of Multiclass Service and Production Systems

Cited in

(8)

• Mathematical methods to study the polling systems
• Wait-and-see strategies in polling models
• MORE ON USING FORCED IDLE TIME TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE IN POLLING MODELS
• Setups in polling models: does it make sense to set up if no work is waiting?
• IMPROVING THE PERFORMANCE OF POLLING MODELS USING FORCED IDLE TIMES
• The relationship between preventive maintenance and manufacturing system performance
• Operation regimes and slower-is-faster-effect in the control of traffic intersections
• Controlling adverse effect on work in process inventory while reducing machine setup time

This page was built for publication: When does forced idle time improve performance in polling models?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2784014)