When is argumentation deductive?

DOI10.1080/11663081.2023.2246862MaRDI QIDQ6056709zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Henry Prakken

Publication date 30 October 2023

Published in Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2023.2246862

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationdeductiondefeasibility

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mathematical logic and foundations (03-XX)

Cites work

• A comparative study of some central notions of \(\mathit{ASPIC}^+\) and \textit{DeLP}
• A general account of argumentation with preferences
• A logic for default reasoning
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• Computational models of argument (COMMA 2010). Proceedings of 3rd conference, Desanzano del Garda, Italy, September 2010.
• Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning.
• Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
• How to reason defeasibly
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4164169 (Why is no real title available?)
• Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
• Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• Structural Properties for Deductive Argument Systems
• Systems and Implementations for Solving Reasoning Problems in Conditional Logics
• The effect of knowledge on belief: Conditioning, specificity and the lottery paradox in default reasoning

This page was built for publication: When is argumentation deductive?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6056709)