Which are the true defeasible logics?

DOI10.1080/11663081.2024.2386918MaRDI QIDQ6936355zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Michael J. Maher

Publication date 29 August 2025

Published in Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2024.2386918

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mathematical logic and foundations (03-XX)

Cites work

• A defeasible logic for modelling policy-based intentions and motivational attitudes
• A logic for default reasoning
• A skeptical theory of inheritance in nonmonotonic semantic networks
• Ambiguity Propagating Defeasible Logic and the Well-Founded Semantics
• An inclusion theorem for defeasible logics
• Annotated defeasible logic
• Comparing defeasible logics
• Defeasible Logic is Stable
• Defeasible reasoning via \(\mathrm{Datalog} {}^\neg\)
• EMIL: extracting meaning from inconsistent language. Towards argumentation using a controlled natural language interface
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1964822 (Why is no real title available?)
• Large-scale parallel stratified defeasible reasoning
• Linear logic
• Modal Rules: Extending Defeasible Logic with Modal Operators
• Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics
• Propositional defeasible logic has linear complexity
• Representation results for defeasible logic
• Rethinking defeasible reasoning: a scalable approach
• Skepticism and floating conclusions
• Well-founded semantics for defeasible logic

This page was built for publication: Which are the true defeasible logics?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6936355)