Why adaptive finite element methods outperform classical ones

MaRDI QIDQ3096718zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Ricardo H. Nochetto

Publication date 11 November 2011

Full work available at URL http://ebooks.worldscinet.com/ISBN/9789814324359/9789814324359_0168.html

zbMATH Keywords

a posteriori error estimatesadaptivityapproximation classcontractionconvergence rateserror boundsfinite element methodsnonlinear approximationsecond order elliptic equation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Boundary value problems for second-order elliptic equations (35J25) Stability and convergence of numerical methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N12) Error bounds for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N15) Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N30) Mesh generation, refinement, and adaptive methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs (65N50)

Recommendations

• Theory of adaptive finite element methods: An introduction
• Convergence and quasi-optimality of adaptive finite element methods for harmonic forms
• Optimality of a standard adaptive finite element method
• Convergence of Adaptive Finite Element Methods
• Primer of adaptive finite element methods

Cited in

(1)

• Residual-type a posteriori error estimates for the Darcy-Forchheimer problem

This page was built for publication: Why adaptive finite element methods outperform classical ones

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3096718)