Width versus size in resolution proofs
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- An exponential separation between the parity principle and the pigeonhole principle
- Hard examples for resolution
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3904557 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3904630 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1223618 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1559594 (Why is no real title available?)
- Many hard examples for resolution
- On the complexity of regular resolution and the Davis-Putnam procedure
- Optimality of size-width tradeoffs for resolution
- Regular resolution lower bounds for the weak pigeonhole principle
- Resolution lower bounds for perfect matching principles
- Resolution lower bounds for the weak functional pigeonhole principle.
- Resolution lower bounds for the weak pigeonhole principle
- Resolution proofs of generalized pigeonhole principles
- Short proofs are narrow—resolution made simple
- The intractability of resolution
Cited in
(12)- Optimality of size-width tradeoffs for resolution
- Resolution proofs of matching principles
- A tradeoff between length and width in resolution
- Short proofs are narrow -- resolution made simple
- Width and size of regular resolution proofs
- A new kind of tradeoffs in propositional proof complexity
- Hard examples for resolution
- Short proofs are narrow—resolution made simple
- Resolution and the binary encoding of combinatorial principles
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7561756 (Why is no real title available?)
- Theory and Applications of Models of Computation
- Exponential resolution lower bounds for weak pigeonhole principle and perfect matching formulas over sparse graphs
This page was built for publication: Width versus size in resolution proofs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2382288)