Pages that link to "Item:Q2365784"
From MaRDI portal
The following pages link to Almost all social choice rules are highly manipulable, but a few aren't (Q2365784):
Displayed 20 items.
- The difference between manipulability indices in the IC and IANC models (Q284375) (← links)
- A quantitative Gobbard-Satterthwaite theorem without neutrality (Q343234) (← links)
- Are Condorcet procedures so bad according to the reinforcement axiom? (Q404755) (← links)
- Voting with rubber bands, weights, and strings (Q449038) (← links)
- On the manipulability of voting rules: the case of \(4\) and \(5\) alternatives (Q449050) (← links)
- The geometry of manipulation -- a quantitative proof of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem (Q452827) (← links)
- Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules (Q492810) (← links)
- Almost-dominant strategy implementation: exchange economies (Q705955) (← links)
- On the average minimum size of a manipulating coalition (Q862542) (← links)
- Anonymous voting and minimal manipulability (Q996393) (← links)
- Minimally manipulable anonymous social choice functions (Q997202) (← links)
- Asymptotics of the minimum manipulating coalition size for positional voting rules under impartial culture behaviour (Q1042332) (← links)
- Defending against strategic manipulation in uninorm-based multi-agent decision making (Q1848621) (← links)
- The reinforcement axiom under sequential positional rules (Q1959697) (← links)
- Strategic voting and nomination (Q2247944) (← links)
- Exact results on manipulability of positional voting rules (Q2385127) (← links)
- Gains from manipulating social choice rules (Q2391056) (← links)
- Some further results on the manipulability of social choice rules (Q2432505) (← links)
- Monotonicity properties and their adaptation to irresolute social choice rules (Q2450081) (← links)
- Minimal manipulability: unanimity and nondictatorship (Q2641999) (← links)