Profit and risk under subprime mortgage securitization (Q659554): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Profit and risk under subprime mortgage securitization / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Optimal mortgage loan securitization and the subprime crisis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bank valuation and its connections with the subprime mortgage crisis and basel II capital accord / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Subprime risk and insurance with regret / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:19, 4 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Profit and risk under subprime mortgage securitization
scientific article

    Statements

    Profit and risk under subprime mortgage securitization (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    23 January 2012
    0 references
    Summary: We investigate the securitization of subprime residential mortgage loans into structured products such as subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBSs) and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). Our deliberations focus on profit and risk in a discrete-time framework as they are related to RMBSs and RMBS CDOs. In this regard, profit is known to be an important indicator of financial health. With regard to risk, we discuss credit (including counterparty and default), market (including interest rate, price, and liquidity), operational (including house appraisal, valuation, and compensation), tranching (including maturity mismatch and synthetic) and systemic (including maturity transformation) risks. Also, we consider certain aspects of Basel regulation when securitization is taken into account. The main hypothesis of this paper is that the SMC was mainly caused by the intricacy and design of subprime mortgage securitization that led to information (asymmetry, contagion, inefficiency, and loss) problems, valuation opaqueness and ineffective risk mitigation. The aforementioned hypothesis is verified in a theoretical- and numerical-quantitative context and is illustrated via several examples.
    0 references

    Identifiers