Publication:273486: Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Publication:273486
Created automatically from import240129110155 |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 01:52, 30 January 2024
DOI10.1016/J.JNT.2016.02.015zbMATH Open1398.12013arXiv1511.05794OpenAlexW2963746240MaRDI QIDQ273486FDOQ273486
Publication date: 22 April 2016
Published in: Journal of Number Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Marc Krasner proposed a theory of limits of local fields in which one relates the extensions of a local field to the extensions of a sequence of related local fields. The key ingredient in his approach was the notion of valued hyperfields, which occur as quotients of local fields. Pierre Deligne developed a different approach to the theory of limits of local fields which replaced the use of hyperfields by the use of what he termed triples, which consist of truncated discrete valuation rings plus some extra data. We study the relationship between Krasner's valued hyperfields and Deligne's triples.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05794
local fieldsdiscretely valued fieldshyperfieldslimits of local fieldstruncated discrete valuation rings
Non-Archimedean valued fields (12J25) Hypergroups (20N20) General theory of commutative topological algebras (46J05)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Universal Thickening of the Field of Real Numbers
- From monoids to hyperstructures: in search of an absolute arithmetic
- Le corps des normes de certaines extensions infinies de corps locaux; applications
- Projective Geometries as Multigroups
- The hyperring of adèle classes
- Relation algebras and projective geometries
- Real reduced multirings and multifields
Cited In (6)
This page was built for publication: An equivalence between two approaches to limits of local fields
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q273486)
