On the substructures \(\Delta\) and \(\nabla\) (Q491344): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Muhammet Tamer Koşan / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Muhammet Tamer Koşan / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 01:25, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the substructures \(\Delta\) and \(\nabla\)
scientific article

    Statements

    On the substructures \(\Delta\) and \(\nabla\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    25 August 2015
    0 references
    Let \(R\) be an associative ring with identity, and \(M\), \(N\) unitary right \(R\)-modules. \([M,N]\) denotes the \((\mathrm{End}_R(N),\mathrm{End}_R(M))\)-bimodule \(\mathrm{Hom } R(M,N)\). The authors of the paper under review discuss the singular sub-bimodules \(\Delta(M,N)\) and cosingular bi-submodule \(\nabla(M,N)\) of \(\mathrm{Hom }R(M,N)\) which are defined as follows: \[ \Delta(M;N)=\{f\in\mathrm{Hom }R(M,N)|\mathrm{Ker }f\leq^eM\}. \] \[ \nabla(M;N)=\{f\in\mathrm{Hom }R(M,N)|\mathrm{Im }f\ll N\}. \] In particular, they discuss the question of when the substructures, the singular sub-bimodule \(\Delta(M;N)\) and the cosingular bi-submodule \(\nabla(M;N)\) of \([M,N]\), are equal to zero. Some well-known results of regular rings are obtained.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    regular morphism
    0 references
    singular bi-submodule
    0 references
    co-singular bi-submodule
    0 references
    0 references