An adoption decision model of emerging capital budgeting methodologies (Q840607): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
 
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 02:21, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
An adoption decision model of emerging capital budgeting methodologies
scientific article

    Statements

    An adoption decision model of emerging capital budgeting methodologies (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 September 2009
    0 references
    Summary: Two emerging methodologies for capital budgeting are real options (RO) and economic value added (EVA). Embracing EVA or RO is not a small undertaking for a firm. Given the extent of the change involved, we recommend that firm adopt these new approaches sequentially. We develop a methodology adoption decision model (MADM) for determining which methodology a firm should adopt first. The MADM focuses on the theoretical soundness and the practical applicability of the methodology. We conclude that EVA is more likely to be embraced by the industry than RO. We therefore recommend that management first focus on EVA adoption.
    0 references
    0 references
    decision analysis
    0 references
    capital budgeting
    0 references
    real options
    0 references
    economic value added (EVA)
    0 references