Abductive explanation-based learning: A solution to the multiple inconsistent explanation problem (Q1189662): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Luminita State / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Luminita State / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 03:28, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Abductive explanation-based learning: A solution to the multiple inconsistent explanation problem
scientific article

    Statements

    Abductive explanation-based learning: A solution to the multiple inconsistent explanation problem (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    27 September 1992
    0 references
    Frequently, as an effect of the incompleteness and incorrectness of the available information, domain theories produce multiple explanations for training instances, not all of them are correct. The issue proposes the abductive explanation-based learning (A-EBL) as an attempt to solve the multiple inconsistent explanation problem mainly based on using negative examples and set covering techniques. The EBL/TS and the abductive-EBL algorithms are presented in the second section. A formal treatment of A-EBL and EBL/TS, expressed in terms of theoretical results concerning competence and convergence properties, is developed in the next section. Some experimental results on A-EBL are also reported. It is proved that the A-EBL has convergence properties only logarithmically worse than EBL/TS and that A-EBL is computationally efficient when the domain theory is tractable.
    0 references
    0 references
    theory specialization
    0 references
    theory revision
    0 references
    probably approximately correct learning
    0 references
    explanation-based learning
    0 references