Intersections of randomly embedded sparse graphs are Poisson (Q1307020): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Ioan Tomescu / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Ioan Tomescu / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 02:53, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Intersections of randomly embedded sparse graphs are Poisson
scientific article

    Statements

    Intersections of randomly embedded sparse graphs are Poisson (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    16 January 2000
    0 references
    This paper considers random embeddings of an \(m\)-vertex graph \(G\) into the complete graph \(K_{n}\) where \(m\leq n\). If \(V(G)=\{1,2,\ldots ,m\}\), by a random embedding of \(G\) into \(K_{n}\) is meant that one of the \((n)_{m}\) injections of an \(m\)-set into an \(n\)-set is chosen from the uniform distribution. The reviewer [Discrete Math. 169, No. 1-3, 283-286 (1997; Zbl 0873.05051)] has shown that the number of edges a randomly embedded graph \(G_{n}\) has in common with a random spanning tree of \(K_{n}\) is asymptotically Poisson when the degree of the graph is bounded. This can be interpreted in terms of random embeddings of pairs of graphs in \(K_{n}\). Theorem 1 of this paper discusses random embeddings of \(t\)-tuples of graphs giving sufficient conditions for the number of edges common to all \(t\) of the labellings to be asymptotically Poisson as \(n\rightarrow \infty \) (which are, in a sense, best possible). In Theorem 2 this theorem is used to extend the reviewer's result from graphs of bounded degree to those whose degrees may grow as fast as \(o(n\) log log \(n\)/ log \(n\)). The proof of Theorem 1 requires an inversion theorem for falling moments, which is proved in the paper.
    0 references
    Poisson distribution
    0 references
    falling moments
    0 references
    spanning tree
    0 references
    complete graph
    0 references
    random embedding
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references