On the equivalence of McShane and Lebesgue integrals (Q1374565): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q228749
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Milan Tvrdý / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 04:07, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the equivalence of McShane and Lebesgue integrals
scientific article

    Statements

    On the equivalence of McShane and Lebesgue integrals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    10 December 1997
    0 references
    It is known that a given function \(f:[a,b]\to \mathbb R\) is Lebesgue integrable on \([a,b]\) if and only if it is McShane integrable. (For the definition of the McShane integral, which is a sum type integral related to the Henstock-Kurzweil integral [see, e.g., Definition 16.7 in \textit{P.-Y. Lee}, ``Lanzhou lectures on Henstock integration'' (1989; Zbl 0699.26004)] The author gives a new proof of this result which does not rely on measure theory. In particular, he does not make use of the Egoroff and Luzin theorems.
    0 references
    0 references
    McShane integral
    0 references
    Lebesgue integral
    0 references
    0 references