Factorisation of snarks (Q2380465): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Martin Škoviera / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Martin Škoviera / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 07:56, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Factorisation of snarks
scientific article

    Statements

    Factorisation of snarks (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    26 March 2010
    0 references
    Summary: We develop a theory of factorisation of snarks cubic graphs with edge-chromatic number 4 based on the classical concept of the dot product. Our main concern are irreducible snarks, those where the removal of every nontrivial edge-cut yields a 3-edge-colourable graph. We show that if an irreducible snark can be expressed as a dot product of two smaller snarks, then both of them are irreducible. This result constitutes the first step towards the proof of the following ``unique-factorisation'' theorem: Every irreducible snark \(G\) can be factorised into a collection \(\{H_1,\dots, H_n\}\) of cyclically 5-connected irreducible snarks such that \(G\) can be reconstructed from them by iterated dot products. Moreover, such a collection is unique up to isomorphism and ordering of the factors regardless of the way in which the decomposition was performed. The result is best possible in the sense that it fails for snarks that are close to being irreducible but themselves are not irreducible. Besides this theorem, a number of other results are proved. For example, the unique-factorisation theorem is extended to the case of factorisation with respect to a preassigned subgraph \(K\) which is required to stay intact during the whole factorisation process. We show that if \(K\) has order at least 3, then the theorem holds, but is false when \(K\) has order 2.
    0 references

    Identifiers