Ultrasonic periodontal probing based on the dynamic wavelet fingerprint (Q2570558): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 07:37, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Ultrasonic periodontal probing based on the dynamic wavelet fingerprint
scientific article

    Statements

    Ultrasonic periodontal probing based on the dynamic wavelet fingerprint (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    28 October 2005
    0 references
    Summary: Manual pocket depth probing has been widely used as a retrospective diagnosis method in periodontics. However, numerous studies have questioned its ability to accurately measure the anatomic pocket depth. In this paper, an ultrasonic periodontal probing method is described, which involves using a hollow water-filled probe to focus a narrow beam of ultrasound energy into and out of the periodontal pocket, followed by automatic processing of pulse-echo signals to obtain the periodontal pocket depth. The signal processing algorithm consists of three steps: peak detection/characterization, peak classification, and peak identification. A dynamic wavelet fingerprint (DWFP) technique is first applied to detect suspected scatterers in the A-scan signal and generate a two-dimensional black and white pattern to characterize the local transient signal corresponding to each scatterer. These DWFP patterns are then classified by a two-dimensional FFT procedure and mapped to an inclination index curve. The location of the pocket bottom was identified as the third broad peak in the inclination index curve. The algorithm is tested on full-mouth probing data from two sequential visits of 14 patients. Its performance is evaluated by comparing ultrasonic probing results with that of full-mouth manual probing at the same sites, which is taken as the ``gold standard.''
    0 references
    ultrasonic
    0 references
    periodontal
    0 references
    probe
    0 references
    wavelet
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references