MIMD implementations of linear solvers for oil reservoir simulation (Q2638722): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Richard D. Kenway / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Juan Pedro Milaszewicz / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 07:57, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
MIMD implementations of linear solvers for oil reservoir simulation
scientific article

    Statements

    MIMD implementations of linear solvers for oil reservoir simulation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1990
    0 references
    The paper presents a set of numerical experiments to solve linear systems arising from oil reservoir simulation, because solving them represents half of the overall computational effort involved in the simulation. The authors compare several basic iterative algorithms that they have implemented on a transputer network: conjugate gradients, Jacobi, Gauss- Seidel and SOR. They also discuss decomposition strategies for each method. Their conclusion is that conjugate gradients are a far better choice than any other; second comes the Jacobi method. A discussion of the implementation of incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient follows and the authors find it relatively disappointing, because the performance worsens with respect to plain conjugate gradient, as the number of processors increases; they reasonably attribute it to the fact that the preconditioning step (the Cholesky decomposition) is of sequential nature. The authors finally propose to shift to the parallel Jacobi iteration as a preconditioner for conjugate gradients and the numerical experiments show a significant improvement over the conjugate gradient method.
    0 references
    Jacobi iterations
    0 references
    parallel computation
    0 references
    Gauss-Seidel method
    0 references
    successive overrelaxation
    0 references
    numerical experiments
    0 references
    oil reservoir simulation
    0 references
    iterative algorithms
    0 references
    transputer network
    0 references
    conjugate gradients
    0 references
    incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient
    0 references
    preconditioning
    0 references
    Cholesky decomposition
    0 references

    Identifiers