On the dual pairs \((O(p,q), SL(2,\mathbb{R}))\), \((U(p,q), U(1,1))\) and \((Sp(p,q), O^*(4))\) (Q1305087): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q166133
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Karl-Hermann Neeb / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1999.187.349 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2058362338 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 19:41, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the dual pairs \((O(p,q), SL(2,\mathbb{R}))\), \((U(p,q), U(1,1))\) and \((Sp(p,q), O^*(4))\)
scientific article

    Statements

    On the dual pairs \((O(p,q), SL(2,\mathbb{R}))\), \((U(p,q), U(1,1))\) and \((Sp(p,q), O^*(4))\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    7 February 2000
    0 references
    Let \(Sp(2k,\mathbb R)\) denote the symplectic group acting on \(\mathbb R^{2k}\) and consider a dual pair \((G,G')\), i.e., two reductive subgroups of \(Sp(2k,\mathbb R)\) which are their mutual centralizers. In addition, we assume that \(G\) and \(G'\) are invariant under the standard Cartan involution of \(G\), so that \(K := G \cap U(k)\) and \(K' := G' \cap U(k)\) are their maximal compact subgroups. If \(H\) is a reductive subgroup of \(Sp(2k,\mathbb R)\) with maximal compact subgroup \(K_H \subseteq U(k)\) and \(\widetilde K_H\) the corresponding subgroup of the twofold covering group \(\widetilde Sp(2k,\mathbb R)\) of \(Sp(2k,\mathbb R)\), then we write \({\mathcal R}(\mathbf h,\widetilde K_H, \omega)\) for the set of equivalence classes of simple \((\mathbf h,\widetilde K_H)\) modules which can be obtained as simple quotients of submodules of the oscillator representation \(\omega\) on the space \({\mathcal P}\) of holomorphic polynomials on \(\mathbb C^k\) (here we use the realization in the Fock model). The theta correspondence between \({\mathcal R}(\mathbf g,\widetilde K, \omega)\) and \({\mathcal R}(\mathbf g',\widetilde K', \omega)\) is now established as follows. For \(\rho \in {\mathcal R}(\mathbf g',\widetilde K', \omega)\) we consider the space \(\Omega(\rho) := {\mathcal P}/{\mathcal N}_\rho\), where \({\mathcal N}_\rho\) is the intersection of all \((\mathbf g', \widetilde K')\)-submodules \({\mathcal N}\) of \({\mathcal P}\) such that \({\mathcal P}/{\mathcal N} \cong \rho\). According to a result of R.\ Howe, we then have \(\Omega(\rho) \cong \rho \otimes \rho'\), where \(\rho'\) is a \((\mathbf g,\widetilde K)\)-module of finite length with a unique simple quotient \(\theta(\rho)\) (the so-called theta lift of \(\rho\)). A central problem in the theory of dual pairs is to make the theta correspondence, i.e., the map \(\theta\), more explicit. In the paper under review, the authors use quite elementary methods and explicit computations with polynomials to make \(\theta\) explicit for the dual pairs \((O(p,q), SL(2,\mathbb R))\), \((U(p,q), U(1,1))\), and \((Sp(p,q), O^*(4))\). In particular their computations provide quite explicit information on the \(K\)-highest weight vectors of the representations.
    0 references
    0 references
    dual pair
    0 references
    oscillator representation
    0 references
    theta lift
    0 references
    theta correspondence
    0 references
    reductive group
    0 references
    0 references