On hypergeometric functions in several variables. II: The Wronskian of the hypergeometric functions of type \((n+1,m+1)\) (Q1322332): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2969/jmsj/04540645 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2053736001 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 20:02, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On hypergeometric functions in several variables. II: The Wronskian of the hypergeometric functions of type \((n+1,m+1)\) |
scientific article |
Statements
On hypergeometric functions in several variables. II: The Wronskian of the hypergeometric functions of type \((n+1,m+1)\) (English)
0 references
6 November 1994
0 references
[For part I see the author in ibid. 18, No. 1, 25-74 (1992; Zbl 0767.33009.] Although the fact that the rank of hypergeometric systems \(E(n + 1, m + 1; \lambda)\) is equal to \({m - 1 \choose n}\), where \(\lambda = (\lambda_ 1, \lambda_ 2, \dots, \lambda_{m + 1})\) are complex parameters, is fundamental in studying hypergeometric functions but no explicit statement with rigorous proof is known. For a particular case \(E(3,6; \lambda)\) [\textit{K. Matsumoto}, \textit{T. Sasaki} and \textit{M. Yoshida}, Int. J. Math. 3, 1-164 (1992)] gave explicitly six solutions of the form \(y'\sum_{n\in z\geq 0} A(n)y^ n\), where \(y = (y_ 1, y_ 2, y_ 3, y_ 4)\) and \(p = (p_ 1, p_ 2, p_ 3, p_ 4)\); and \textit{I. M. Gel'fand} and \textit{M. I. Graev} [Sov. Math. Dokl. 34, 9-13 (1987; Zbl 0619.33006)] gave six solutions of \(E(3,6)\), but conditions under which the solutions are linearly independent are not given. In the present paper the author discusses this point in detail and proves that this is so, under a very simple nonintegral condition \(\lambda_ j \in \mathbb{C} - \mathbb{Z}\) \((1 \leq j \leq m)\) \((\mathbb{C}\) represents the set of all complex numbers and \(\mathbb{Z}\) represents the set of integers) using the theory of twisted rational de Rham cohomologies and twisted homologies.
0 references