Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits (Q1317257): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176349403 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2074931146 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 20:54, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits |
scientific article |
Statements
Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits (English)
0 references
18 April 1994
0 references
The authors consider the problem to test the parametric model \(\{m_ \theta\); \(\theta\in\Theta\}\) against the nonparametric alternative that only assumes \(m(\cdot)\) is `smooth'. They propose to use as a test statistics the integrated squared deviation of the parametric and nonparametric curve estimate. They show that the standard way of bootstrapping this statistics fails, however, wild bootstrap works. The validity of the asymptotic results is checked in a Monte Carlo experiment and on the fitting Engel curves in the mean expediture curve of a certain food.
0 references
kernel estimators
0 references
bootstrap
0 references
goodness-of-fit-test
0 references
integrated squared deviation
0 references
curve estimate
0 references
wild bootstrap
0 references
Monte Carlo
0 references
Engel curves
0 references