A simple proof of stability of fronts for the Cahn-Hilliard equation (Q5956075): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200100532 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2071261369 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 20:04, 19 March 2024
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1708437
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A simple proof of stability of fronts for the Cahn-Hilliard equation |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1708437 |
Statements
A simple proof of stability of fronts for the Cahn-Hilliard equation (English)
0 references
19 September 2003
0 references
The authors prove a theorem (Theorem 1.1) on stability in \(L^1\) norm of fronts for the Cahn-Hilliard equation. Consider the Cahn-Hilliard equation on the real line, \[ m_t = (-m_{xx}-1/2 m(1-m^2))_{xx}. \tag{1} \] Let \(\overline m_0(x)= \tanh (x/2)\) be a minimizer of the associated free energy \(F\), and let \(\overline m _a(x)=\overline m(x-a)\) be its translate by \(a\). Let \(m_0(x)\) be some function that will serve as initial data for (1), let \(m(t)\) be the solution of (1) through \(m_0(x)\), and define \(a\) by \(\int_{\mathbb R } (m_0(x)-\overline m_a(x)) dx = 0\). Suppose that \(\int_{\mathbb R }x^2(m_0(x)- \overline m_0(x))^2 dx \leq c_0\) for some positive constant \(c_0\). Then for any \(\varepsilon > 0\) there is a positive constant \(\delta=\delta(\varepsilon, c_0)\) such that if \(\int_{ \mathbb R }(m_0(x)-\overline m_0(x))^2 dx \leq \delta\), we have that \[ \|m(t)- \overline m_a \|_1 \leq c_2(1+c_1 t)^{-(5/52-\varepsilon)}, \] where \(a\) is as defined above and \(c_1\), \(c_2\) depend on \(\varepsilon\) and \(c_0\). Similar algebraic decay estimates hold for the excess free energy. The main ingredients in the dissipation-dichotomy argument are the lower bound on the dissipation rate (Lemma 1.4), the moment inequality of Theorem 1.5, the constrained uncertainty principle (1.24) and the consequences of the differential inequalities (1.30), that elegantly (since \(9/13>1/2\)) allow the authors to derive the \(L^1\) decay estimates. The paper is not self-contained and uses freely results from previous work by the authors [J. Phys. 95, 1069-1117 (1999; Zbl 0931.35174) and Commun. Partial Differ. Equations 25, 847-886 (2000; Zbl 0954.35030)]. The missing reference on p. 339 is to (1.29).
0 references
algebraic decay
0 references
constrained uncertainty principle
0 references
dissipation-dichotomy
0 references