Lifting of operators and prescribed numbers of negative squares (Q1095379): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Grigore Arsene / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Tiberiu Constantinescu / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Aurelian Gheondea / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1307/mmj/1029003552 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2041156159 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 20:34, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Lifting of operators and prescribed numbers of negative squares
scientific article

    Statements

    Lifting of operators and prescribed numbers of negative squares (English)
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    The authors extend a problem of dilation theory from the case of definite inner product spaces to that of Pontryagin spaces. Using the Hilbert spaces \({\mathcal K}_ 1\), \({\mathcal K}_ 2\), \({\mathcal K}'_ 1\) and \({\mathcal K}'_ 2\), and the corresponding symmetries \(J_ 1\), \(J_ 2\), \(J'_ 1\) and \(J'_ 2\), they consider \(\tilde {\mathcal K}_ i={\mathcal K}_ i\oplus {\mathcal K}'_ i\) and \(\tilde J_ i=J_ i\oplus J'_ i\), \(i=1,2\). If \(T\in {\mathcal L}({\mathcal K}_ 1,{\mathcal K}_ 2)\) is such that the negative signature of \(J_ 1-T^*J_ 2T\) is a given cardinal k, and \(\bar k\) is another given cardinal, the problem (denoted (*)) is to give a description of all operators \(\tilde T\in {\mathcal L}(\tilde {\mathcal K}_ 1,\tilde {\mathcal K}_ 2)\) such that \(P_{{\mathcal K}_ 2}^{\tilde {\mathcal K}_ 2} \tilde T | {\mathcal K}_ 1=T\) and \(k^-(\tilde J_ 1-\tilde T^*\tilde J_ 2\tilde T)=\bar k\). The answer is mainly contained in the following theorem: (i) If (*) has solutions, then \[ \bar k\geq \max \{k-\bar k(\tilde {\mathcal K}_ 2)+k^-({\mathcal K}_ 2),\quad k^-(\tilde {\mathcal K}_ 1)-k^- (\tilde {\mathcal K}_ 2)\}. \] (ii) The formula \[ T=\left( \begin{matrix} T\\ \Gamma_ 2D_ T\end{matrix} \begin{matrix} D_{T^*}\Gamma_ 1\\ -\Gamma_ 2L^*_ TJ_{T^*}\quad \Gamma_ 1+D_{\Gamma^*_ 2}\Gamma D_{\Gamma_ 1}\end{matrix} \right) \] establishes a one-to-one correspondence between the set of all solutions of (*) with \(\bar k=k- k^-(\tilde {\mathcal K}_ 2)+k^-({\mathcal K}_ 2)\geq k^-(\tilde {\mathcal K}_ 1)-k^-(\tilde {\mathcal K}_ 2)\) and the triplets \(\{\Gamma_ 1,\Gamma_ 2,\Gamma \}\), where \(\Gamma_ 1\in {\mathcal L}({\mathcal K}'_ 1,{\mathcal D}_{T^*})\) and \(\Gamma_ 2\in {\mathcal L}({\mathcal D}_ T,{\mathcal K}'_ 2)\), \(\Gamma_ 1\) and \(\Gamma^{\#}_ 1\) being J-contractions, while \(\Gamma\in {\mathcal L}({\mathcal D}_{\Gamma_ 1},{\mathcal D}_{\Gamma^*_ 2})\) is a Hilbert space contraction.
    0 references
    dilation theory
    0 references
    Pontryagin spaces
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references