Mathematical and physical requirements for successful computations with viscoelastic fluid models (Q1116775): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0257(88)85052-3 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2067801821 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 22:18, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Mathematical and physical requirements for successful computations with viscoelastic fluid models |
scientific article |
Statements
Mathematical and physical requirements for successful computations with viscoelastic fluid models (English)
0 references
1988
0 references
For general applicability in arbitrary geometries, viscoelastic fluid models must have regular viscometric functions. Classical quasi-linear Maxwell and Jeffreys (or Oldroyd) models do not satisfy this requirement. Their plane-elongational viscosity is infinite for a finite value of the elongation. The recently developed non-linear Leonov and Giesekus models have regular viscometric functions. The type and boundary conditions of the system of equations are analyzed. M-type models (retardation time equal to zero, or extra viscosity \(\eta_ s=0)\) have characteristics that are not the same at those of the equations of motion and the constitutive equations separately. A simplified 2-D problem is analysed, and it appears that one stress component satisfies an elliptic equation and that it is not allowed to specify this stress component independently at the inflow boundary. J- type models \((\eta_ s>0)\) have characteristics, which are the same for the total system and for the decomposed system and there is no problem with boundary conditions. A few computational results are presented based on an algorithm that solves the equations of motion with an estimate of the stress tensor, and (re-)computes the stresses by integration along the characteristics. For an arbitrary, given velocity field the stability of integration of the stresses along the characteristics (the particle trajectories) is studied. This shows the inferiority of the quasi-linear models compared with the non-linear ones.
0 references
arbitrary geometries
0 references
non-linear Leonov and Giesekus models
0 references
M-type models
0 references
J-type models
0 references
particle trajectories
0 references