Entropy versus orbit equivalence for minimal homeomorphisms (Q1326967): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: David E. Handelman / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Michael Sears / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: David E. Handelman / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Michael Sears / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1994.164.1 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1970497341 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 22:18, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Entropy versus orbit equivalence for minimal homeomorphisms
scientific article

    Statements

    Entropy versus orbit equivalence for minimal homeomorphisms (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    16 May 1995
    0 references
    The authors construct examples of minimal homeomorphisms of all possible (topological) entropies (including infinite entropy) which are orbit equivalent in a particularly strong way to the dyadic adding machine. They also establish that any minimal homeomorphism of the Cantor set is (strongly) orbit equivalent to one of zero entropy. Two spaces with homeomorphisms, \((X_ i, \phi_ i)\) \((i = 1,2)\) are orbit equivalent if there is a homeomorphism \(F : X_ 1 \to X_ 2\) that maps orbit to orbits. In this case we obtain functions \(n : X_ 1 \to \mathbb{Z}\) such that \(F \phi_ 1(x) = \phi^{n(x)}_ 2 F(x)\) and \(F \phi^{m(x)}_ 1 (x) = \phi_ 2 F(x)\). \((X_ 1, \phi_ 1)\) and \((X_ 2, \phi_ 2)\) are said to be strongly orbit equivalent if \(m\) and \(n\) each have at most one point of discontinuity. The authors use the concept of Bratteli diagrams and associated dimension groups to produce their ingenious construction because the adding machine arises from a simple Bratteli diagram. [See \textit{R. H. Herman, I. F. Putnam} and \textit{C. F. Skau}, Int. J. Math. 3, No. 6, 827-864 (1992; Zbl 0786.46053)].
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    minimal homeomorphism
    0 references
    Cantor set
    0 references
    entropy
    0 references
    strongly orbit equivalent
    0 references
    Bratteli diagrams
    0 references
    dimension groups
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references