A risk-based interval two-stage programming model for agricultural system management under uncertainty (Q1793525): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q59141177, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1706518640034
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Guo He Huang / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Guo He Huang / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7438913 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2508474047 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 23:03, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A risk-based interval two-stage programming model for agricultural system management under uncertainty
scientific article

    Statements

    A risk-based interval two-stage programming model for agricultural system management under uncertainty (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    12 October 2018
    0 references
    Summary: Nonpoint source (NPS) pollution caused by agricultural activities is main reason that water quality in watershed becomes worse, even leading to deterioration. Moreover, pollution control is accompanied with revenue's fall for agricultural system. How to design and generate a cost-effective and environmentally friendly agricultural production pattern is a critical issue for local managers. In this study, a risk-based interval two-stage programming model (RBITSP) was developed. Compared to general ITSP model, significant contribution made by RBITSP model was that it emphasized importance of financial risk under various probabilistic levels, rather than only being concentrated on expected economic benefit, where risk is expressed as the probability of not meeting target profit under each individual scenario realization. This way effectively avoided solutions' inaccuracy caused by traditional expected objective function and generated a variety of solutions through adjusting weight coefficients, which reflected trade-off between system economy and reliability. A case study of agricultural production management with the Tai Lake watershed was used to demonstrate superiority of proposed model. Obtained results could be a base for designing land-structure adjustment patterns and farmland retirement schemes and realizing balance of system benefit, system-failure risk, and water-body protection.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references