Invariance of the Godbillon-Vey class by \(C^1\)-diffeomorphisms for higher codimensional foliations (Q1306441): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2969/jmsj/05130655 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2061025109 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 22:14, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Invariance of the Godbillon-Vey class by \(C^1\)-diffeomorphisms for higher codimensional foliations |
scientific article |
Statements
Invariance of the Godbillon-Vey class by \(C^1\)-diffeomorphisms for higher codimensional foliations (English)
0 references
21 February 2000
0 references
The author shows that the Godbillon-Vey invariant of foliations is invariant by \(C^1\)-diffeomorphisms which preserve the foliations. This is a generalization of former results of \textit{G. Raby} [Ann. Inst. Fourier 38, No. 1, 205-213 (1988; Zbl 0596.57018)] for codimension-one foliations. The result seems mysterious when compared with the fact that the Godbillon-Vey class can not be defined for foliations of class \(C^1\) [\textit{T. Tsuboi}, Ann. Math., II. Ser. 130, No. 2, 227-271 (1989; Zbl 0701.57012)]. In the case of codimension one, we can understand the invariance from the fact that \(C^1\)-conjugacy means that the foliations under consideration are almost \(C^2\)-conjugate [\textit{E. Ghys} and \textit{T. Tsuboi}, Ann. Inst. Fourier 38, No. 1, 215-244 (1988; Zbl 0633.58018)]. But we do not have any good explanation for the higher codimensional cases.
0 references
\(C^1\)-invariance
0 references
secondary characteristic classes
0 references