Dilation invariant estimates and the boundary Gårding inequality for higher order elliptic operators (Q1895825): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Gregory C. Verchota / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Gregory C. Verchota / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2118610 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2071790509 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 22:53, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Dilation invariant estimates and the boundary Gårding inequality for higher order elliptic operators
scientific article

    Statements

    Dilation invariant estimates and the boundary Gårding inequality for higher order elliptic operators (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    6 September 1995
    0 references
    The Dirichlet problem for \(Lu=0\) with data in \(L^2(\partial \Omega,d \sigma)\) or the Sobolev space \(L^2_1(\partial \Omega,d \sigma)\) is solved for all real homogeneous constant coefficient elliptic operators \(L=\sum_{|\alpha|=2m} a_\alpha D^\alpha\), \(m\in \mathbb{N}\), in bounded Lipschitz domains \(\Omega\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n\). Then, a perturbation technique due to Dahlberg and Kenig immediately implies solvability in \(L^p\) and \(L^p_1\) for \(2-\varepsilon <p<2+\varepsilon\) where \(\varepsilon>0\) depends on the Lipschitz character of \(\Omega\), \(m,n\), and the ellipticity constant associated with \(L\). The central question we are addressing here is what exactly does ellipticity (in the homogeneous case) imply about dilation invariant estimates near the boundary for solutions to the Dirichlet problem. Our Theorems provide a complete answer in the following sense. For any \(p\neq 2\) it is possible to find an \(m\), an \(n\), and a bounded Lipschitz domain in \(\mathbb{R}^n\) so that the Dirichlet problem is not solvable for data in \(L^p\) (and \(L^p_1)\) for \(L\) of order \(2m\). However, for a given \(m\) or \(n\) the situation is more complicated. All of the previous methods for solving boundary value problems for higher order operators on Lipschitz (or \({\mathcal C}^1)\) boundaries relied on special algebraic properties of the operators in question, namely that they were powers of second order operators. In this paper our main contribution is to overcome the difficulties in relaxing this assumption. Our approach is to obtain a priori dilation invariant estimates for known solutions in smooth domains and then to obtain the same estimates together with point-wise limits at the boundary in Lipschitz domains by an approximation argument. The two main tools used to do this are some new Rellich inequalities and the representation of solutions by means of layer potentials.
    0 references
    \(L^ p\)-Dirichlet problem
    0 references
    a priori dilation invariant estimates
    0 references
    Rellich inequalities
    0 references
    layer potentials
    0 references

    Identifiers